Hey Tuners!!

[Derek]

Or anybody for that matter. Anyone want to way in on maf vs sd tune. Pros or Cons , anybody around here running SD at all? :roll:

[1998ta__1991rs]

im going to be running sd when my car is back together but im FI

[1iron]

I run SD.

[BAD BOB]

for a basic nothing really special i think a maf is prolly the easiest

[minytrker]

MAF is easiest, but I prefere SD. I run all my stuff in SD except my G8, I run in MAF only but its a E38 so thats a dissfernt story. I ran my Z06 SD, my camaro, truck and every other crs of mine.
It really depends on the mods and what your trying to do on which would be better. There are tons of myths about SD all over the internet.

[Derek]

Thanks for the input guys. Still toying with idea of a single plain and 4brl tb.

[ElecTech]

Or anybody for that matter. Anyone want to way in on maf vs sd tune. Pros or Cons , anybody around here running SD at all? :roll:

I don't care either way, from a tuning standpoint. SD is definately easier to "package" in an engine compartment. With some of the new aftermarket sensors and GMs use of the "card" style MAF, they don't create the airflow restrictions they once did.

[Derek]

I don't care either way, from a tuning standpoint. SD is definately easier to "package" in an engine compartment. With some of the new aftermarket sensors and GMs use of the "card" style MAF, they don't create the airflow restrictions they once did.

Thats what I was getting from it. I really needed someone with more knowledge of the subject to confirm.Thanks :bigthumb:

[Chillerman]

Talk to 1iron. His SD system works very well on his car.