Quote:
Originally Posted by bambooi
Robert is saying he wouldn't if he was passing people.
|
If im passing people, isnt that what a passing lane is for?!?!?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForceFed4g63
I'm that guy that's in the left lane, if I see somebody zoom up on me, they can wait until I have a decent clearing in the right lane for me to move over. If I'm in the left lane I'm usually going 10 over anyways so I don't feel bad about them waiting.
|
I think this post pretty much sums up what ive been saying. Thats just common sense!
Ill repeat myself.
Its not reasonable for you to have to jump into slower traffic to let the other guy get around you. Finish passing and get over when you have a reasonable amount of clear space.
What I just typed above is what we see in that video. He was passing a bunch of slow moving cars, when they cleared up he tried to get over but mr impatient was not gonna have it.
Why should the guy in the left lane PASSING PEOPLE force his way into slower traffic, to let the guy behind him go? The guy wasnt camping. I could maybe see your point if he was pacing the other cars in the right lane, but he wasnt. For him to get into the right lane he would have had to slow up a bit and cut close to the other cars in the left lane. How is that more reasonable than just finishing passing then move over when the lane is clear, like others in this thread have said?
Quote:
Originally Posted by bambooi
You are repeating what I said. I did watch the video. The SUV guy had multiple chances to move over. SUV driver was barely passing people. He could have moved over and let the faster car pass and move back into the passing lane. He is not passing people at a very fast right so move over so a faster car can go.
|
We are seeing two completely different things. Just my opinion, your interpretation is wrong, thats why we are having this disagreement.