![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Myrtle Beach
Posts: 2,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Savannah GA
Posts: 1,725
|
That will make people look twice. It doesnt look bad. Just not to sure about the ford/dodge thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mt. Pleasant
Posts: 70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Savannah GA
Posts: 1,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mt. Pleasant
Posts: 70
|
seriously, that car makes baby Jesus cry.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
|
Its only a mustang.
<----hides
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Summerville
Posts: 7,740
|
y would someone waste time on that? Not to mention its ugly as sin IMO.
__________________
M.R.E. Bad Bob Motorsports |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
|
I do like the look if chrylser did make a convertible with that front end. Might look killer. But the mustang should not have had that done to it. Mustang's lines do not flow with that. Reminds me of the kid who has the square body dakota i saw with the 300 front end on it. Good craftmanship. Poor design/execution on the vehicle.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 127
|
fuggly, i prefer the rangatang. Ranger with a mustang front end. Lowered it would have looked pimp, but lifted it looked like a stock mustang lol
__________________
Put it in the groove and look at the sky. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|