![]() |
|
|
#21 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ridgeville
Posts: 1,167
|
I paid right around 3 from summit I think
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 965
|
Any thoughts on my stock timing chain with 89k miles on getting pissed off about this upgrade?
__________________
12 GMC Denali HD: 4x4, 12" Bullet Proof, 24x12 American Forces, 40x15.50 Toyo M/T's, h&s mini max, deleted, 5" axle dump, S&B intake,tractions bars, air bags. 04 GMC 1500RST: TMS Iron 347/S480/4l80E - 9.63@143.22 05 GMC 2500HD: LLY@372HP/669TQ, 4x4, 8" FabTech, 4.56 gears & 37" Toyo M/T's |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: West Ash
Posts: 4,283
|
the partiot extremes are fine, thats what im using on my new motor, if anything you can upgrade to a ls2 chain, your stock should be fine
__________________
![]() Funny |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SUMMERVILLE
Posts: 3,681
|
stock should be fine with that mileage. just do the springs
__________________
IM BAD BOB |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ladson,SC
Posts: 3,813
|
PAC-1518 springs. c5r katech timing chain. those plus a 228/228 .591/591 114 lsa cam. triple win!
__________________
![]() Dark Aladdin |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Moncks Corner
Posts: 937
|
truck is sick!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 317
|
I remeber reading that the Patriot Extremes and the Texas Speed Springs are the same springs from the same manufacturer.
I may be wrong though but I do remeber reading along those lines on ls1tech awhile back. I would go with the double springs as I have read alot about the turbo setups and how boost needs a high rate spring pressure at a high psi rate. I remember parish8 tried to get the most out of a 4.8 in his truck and he had the same issue with springs. Next time you go to the track just take the motor and butterfly off your cutout to make sure that it doesn't close back.
__________________
SLOW CREW!!! ASkipper-Pres. BradleyRJ-V.P. Joker-Sec. CPTNSLOW-Tres. Taking applications for slow members!!! Lol ![]() It's stock just got an exhaust leak. My Daily Driver is: '11 GMC Sierra VMAX-camper/car hauler |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 317
|
__________________
SLOW CREW!!! ASkipper-Pres. BradleyRJ-V.P. Joker-Sec. CPTNSLOW-Tres. Taking applications for slow members!!! Lol ![]() It's stock just got an exhaust leak. My Daily Driver is: '11 GMC Sierra VMAX-camper/car hauler |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 317
|
Here is some post that parish8 made about trying to blow up a 4.8 and what it would do stock.
http://performancetrucks.net/forums/...d.php?t=245938 http://performancetrucks.net/forums/...d.php?t=243360
__________________
SLOW CREW!!! ASkipper-Pres. BradleyRJ-V.P. Joker-Sec. CPTNSLOW-Tres. Taking applications for slow members!!! Lol ![]() It's stock just got an exhaust leak. My Daily Driver is: '11 GMC Sierra VMAX-camper/car hauler |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 965
|
Thanks for into guys. Yeah ASkipper parish8 is one of the guys I did a lot of research on prior to my build.
__________________
12 GMC Denali HD: 4x4, 12" Bullet Proof, 24x12 American Forces, 40x15.50 Toyo M/T's, h&s mini max, deleted, 5" axle dump, S&B intake,tractions bars, air bags. 04 GMC 1500RST: TMS Iron 347/S480/4l80E - 9.63@143.22 05 GMC 2500HD: LLY@372HP/669TQ, 4x4, 8" FabTech, 4.56 gears & 37" Toyo M/T's |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Summerville, SC
Posts: 1,525
|
How did the times compare, with/without the 2step?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 317
|
So what's the plan wring all you can out the 4.8 then up it to a 6.0 or bigger.
__________________
SLOW CREW!!! ASkipper-Pres. BradleyRJ-V.P. Joker-Sec. CPTNSLOW-Tres. Taking applications for slow members!!! Lol ![]() It's stock just got an exhaust leak. My Daily Driver is: '11 GMC Sierra VMAX-camper/car hauler |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
One of the first PI springs out there were 90# and later it was found that 110-120# were optimal. Rob, I'm not even gonna begin to try and point you in any direction because I literally have 0 experience with your type engine combo. What works for us, may not work for you...... However we do have some similarities with regards to weight and aerodynamics. I'll start out by saying, what works for cars in a similar engine transmission application, usually turns out to be shit for us and typically that's due to weight and aerodynamics above all. I know your a turbo guy, and i'm sure you know all about bigger turbos and HP vs TQ. The a smaller turbo usually runs out of HP steam fast and starts making gobbs of TQ and hardly anymore HP, you want more HP get a bigger turbo slap it on and there it goes, but the byproduct is usually a drop in TQ at the same boost levels. Torque is important to us because like a tow diesel or anything else that moves weight real good they have gobbs of it, the same goes for us (well lightnings at least). With that bigger turbo you have and less efficient transmission you may need to find something that gets you some torque back like a good cam with some mid range grunt while not sacrificing top end, but not soo large that you loose more in the middle and turn it into a top end roll car/dyno queen like a supra. Now springs, I know your heads are different and I know that they flow better than ours, but this is what I personally learned. I put some 90# springs in my heads the first time, and when I started to make around 20 psi I noticed the power start to wobble and then abruptly tank and that was on a stock crap PI cam, I put some 135# PAC springs in and I noticed it hang on to the power a lot longer with the same cam, apparently I was getting some float at 90# closed and 20 PSI of boost. I also noticed that the more CFM that I made at the same boost number from a better flowing blower would Blow out spark up top and kill my power up top. (not sure how much gap you have, but its another guess) Cams, my truck woke up on cam's I was amazed how much I picked up on the top end with a really mild cam, I picked up a bunch of mid range TQ and top end HP on what would be considered a stage 1 cam (for our motor's). In short and for us TQ= MPH vs HP for our transmission/ converter/ weight in a Lightning at least and the same may work for you.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 965
|
2Step is nice to be able set the rpm up. A 3600 cut me a 1.69, 3700 cut a 1.61, but was hit or miss on keeping on the brake. I think once the transbrake is working, it will work out real nice.
As to whats next after the 4.8L, i'm not 100% sure yet. I'd be jacked if I can keep the 4.8L alive for a bit but I know i'm playing around at a level most haven't.
__________________
12 GMC Denali HD: 4x4, 12" Bullet Proof, 24x12 American Forces, 40x15.50 Toyo M/T's, h&s mini max, deleted, 5" axle dump, S&B intake,tractions bars, air bags. 04 GMC 1500RST: TMS Iron 347/S480/4l80E - 9.63@143.22 05 GMC 2500HD: LLY@372HP/669TQ, 4x4, 8" FabTech, 4.56 gears & 37" Toyo M/T's |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SUMMERVILLE
Posts: 3,681
|
it will be ok, just do some springs and turn the boost up. maybe get a ams1000 to tune the boost to get it off the line the best
__________________
IM BAD BOB |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,489
|
Quote:
90# seat - 20# = 70# seat pressure and this doesn't take into account the 20# applied to X sq. in. surface area of the back of the valve. This final value could be even lower.
__________________
Jaime Last edited by ElecTech; 01-24-2011 at 10:59 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,489
|
The Patriot Extremes are probably the best thing Patriot sells. Good value for sure.
__________________
Jaime |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
The mod motor guys would buy their heads for the port work (that we later found would cause leaks) and take the entire valve train and literally throw it in the trash. From what I've read though they do much better on the GM stuff.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,489
|
Not really. Their flow numbers are weak on the GM side too. Most buy them because they are cheap and most don't know any better.
__________________
Jaime |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,089
|
Thats my bet also. The springs have lasted way longer than I would have guessed, but you know I was against them from the start.
__________________
1999 Z28 Camaro|Cut up 2003 CC Duramax Dually|19.5 w/245/70/19.5|5in exhaust 2009 G8 GT 408hp/402tq sae|Rotofab CAI|LS9 Cam|Headers|GXP Mufflers|Custom System 2009 Tahoe stock |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|