Frankestein Racing Heads

[FRDnemesis]

http://www.frankensteinracingheads.com/

Has anyone heard of them? I see they are doing some stuff with RHS cylinder heads but all they have are overall flow numbers and nothing matched up with a cam to show how well the head performs through the whole RPM.

Any experience or hearsay about them?

Thanks,
Jeff

[Carlrx7]

Mast 305cc heads got u scurd?

[Pesce Nero]

Originally Posted by FRDnemesis

http://www.frankensteinracingheads.com/

Has anyone heard of them? I see they are doing some stuff with RHS cylinder heads but all they have are overall flow numbers and nothing matched up with a cam to show how well the head performs through the whole RPM.

Any experience or hearsay about them?

Thanks,
Jeff

do you think they should put down the Pro Stock heads they are working on to dyno 10 different cams in a LS motor?

[FRDnemesis]

Originally Posted by Carlrx7

Mast 305cc heads got u scurd?

Nope, buddy of mine just read a post that was made on YB about some things they have done with the LS7 RHS head. Some crazy flow numbers but you know how flow numbers don't always equate to great performance through the overall rpm.

As of right now, there hasn't been much proven better than the Mast without spending $5-8k on ALL PRO's.

Just curious if they (frankenstein) have done such great work, why I haven't seen or heard about them til now? It could be as simple as this RHS head is their first step into the LSX world, that is why I'm trying to learn as much as I can about the companies who are working on "aftermarket castings".

[FRDnemesis]

Originally Posted by Pesce Nero

do you think they should put down the Pro Stock heads they are working on to dyno 10 different cams in a LS motor?

A monkey with a dremel can hog out an intake runner to get a large number.

[Pesce Nero]

Originally Posted by FRDnemesis

A monkey with a dremel can hog out an intake runner to get a large number.

do them yourself then

[FRDnemesis]

Originally Posted by Pesce Nero

do them yourself then

Not sure what your deal is, I'm not a professional head porter nor do I play one in the movies, but I have been around long enough to know that just a High flow number means squat on a street car.

The intent of my post was to get some feedback from the vast array of knowledge on this board that spreads across all of the makes, models and types of engines. Someone "may" have heard about Frankenstein racing heads here and have some feedback that may be useful for me.

The RHS LS7 Big Bore head is actually made by DART Machinery, do you have anything to add about these?

[Pesce Nero]

if you simply look at the pictures you just might notice they weren't done by a monkey with a Dremel and I can probably rattle off 10 of the top head porters in the country that you never heard of.

if you want dyno charts comparing cams with there stage 1,2,3 or whatever porting then go to a shop that specializes in that one perticular service

[FRDnemesis]

Originally Posted by Pesce Nero

if you simply look at the pictures you just might notice they weren't done by a monkey with a Dremel and I can probably rattle off 10 of the top head porters in the country that you never heard of.

if you want dyno charts comparing cams with there stage 1,2,3 or whatever porting then go to a shop that specializes in that one perticular service

Yes, I "can" tell the polishing has a lot of time put in to it, no doubt. However, when a company has flow numbers that are about 20-30 cfm higher at every .100 lift increment up to 1.00" of flow then something is either amiss, or they have found some magic; and I'm talking about world class cylinder head shops. I'm sure even "you" would agree with that "perticular" view. That is why I asked here on my home board where we have experience in new school, old school, chevy, ford, mopar etc. etc.

I'm going to put this into perspective for you.

If you did a set of heads for me and then I said "Hey, I found a shop that is getting 30 more cfm across the board than you did on my heads!" What is going to be your first response? I'm gonna guess; it would be something like"what is their aspect ratio, where are they making power, is it only peak power or across and under the torque curve, OR what are their port velocities?

[Pesce Nero]

I think you need to reread what you wrote in your first post. I understand what your getting at now but it took 8 posts and a couple insults to get there

things as simple as changing seat angles can make dramatic improvements in flow although none of them seem to last as long as the 45-46* angle that works so well for general purpose. And maybe they are just full of shit

[FRDnemesis]

Originally Posted by Pesce Nero

I think you need to reread what you wrote in your first post. I understand what your getting at now but it took 8 posts and a couple insults to get there

things as simple as changing seat angles can make dramatic improvements in flow although none of them seem to last as long as the 45-46* angle that works so well for general purpose. And maybe they are just full of shit

The Frankestein guys say that they flow their cylinder heads on a SF-600 flow bench and they "don't" use a pipe on the exhaust.

Would this inflate flow numbers in any way?

[BigdaddyDupree]

Rays has the pacman flow pro model. It's the most badass thing I've seen someone put together honestly. It's wild.

[FRDnemesis]

Originally Posted by Pesce Nero

I think you need to reread what you wrote in your first post. I understand what your getting at now but it took 8 posts and a couple insults to get there

things as simple as changing seat angles can make dramatic improvements in flow although none of them seem to last as long as the 45-46* angle that works so well for general purpose. And maybe they are just full of shit

My intent was not to insult by any means. Your original post struck me as "why would they waste time testing/backing up their work, they don't have time for that". That just rubbed me wrong as in "if you're not Pro Stock, who cares?" If that was not your intent, I apologize

If that was your intent, well then................

But, most Pro shops that cater to the street/strip crowd do provide real world tests like that in most cases because most of those shops get their bread and butter from that crowd.

[Pesce Nero]

Originally Posted by FRDnemesis

The Frankestein guys say that they flow their cylinder heads on a SF-600 flow bench and they "don't" use a pipe on the exhaust.

Would this inflate flow numbers in any way?

can you post the flow numbers? I don't know where your seeing these numbers at

There is a point where they say the 600 becomes unusable. maybe around 380-400 cfm then you would need to use the 1200 although SF has come out with a 750 model now.

another thing is the SF-600 flows at 25" of water depression and you need to mathematically calculate it to 28" unless they use a flocom which is basically what I use that does all the math for the user

[FRDnemesis]

Originally Posted by Pesce Nero

can you post the flow numbers? I don't know where your seeing these numbers at

There is a point where they say the 600 becomes unusable. maybe around 380-400 cfm then you would need to use the 1200 although SF has come out with a 750 model now.

another thing is the SF-600 flows at 25" of water depression and you need to mathematically calculate it to 28" unless they use a flocom which is basically what I use that does all the math for the user

Yes sir.
http://www.yellowbullet.com/forum/sh...d.php?t=451661

It is the post at the very bottom by one of their employees.


These are the cylinder heads that I am sold on at this point.
http://www.mastmotorsports.com/2010/...sembled&id=377

http://www.mastmotorsports.com/2010/..._LS7_Heads.pdf

-jeff

[Pesce Nero]

Originally Posted by FRDnemesis

My intent was not to insult by any means. Your original post struck me as "why would they waste time testing/backing up their work, they don't have time for that". That just rubbed me wrong as in "if you're not Pro Stock, who cares?" If that was not your intent, I apologize

If that was your intent, well then................

But, most Pro shops that cater to the street/strip crowd do provide real world tests like that in most cases because most of those shops get their bread and butter from that crowd.

a pro shop will understand what you want to do. I'm not a pro but I try to think about every possible senerio when I'm doing a set of heads and usually discuss it with the person I'm doing them for. I would think if you told them what you wanted them for a street car, they would say, oh, you cant run our head that flows 450 at 900 lift on that

on another note, if they only have a SF-600, then they are not doing heads for Pro Stock

[Pesce Nero]

Originally Posted by FRDnemesis

Yes sir.
http://www.yellowbullet.com/forum/sh...d.php?t=451661

It is the post at the very bottom by one of their employees.


These are the cylinder heads that I am sold on at this point.
http://www.mastmotorsports.com/2010/...sembled&id=377

http://www.mastmotorsports.com/2010/..._LS7_Heads.pdf

-jeff

first off, I have been to LS Fest twice and have seen many heads that claim to go over 400 cfm so I dont think any of those posted numbers are out of line.

next thing is the Mast heads were only a 20hp improvement over stock heads. also, they take out all the titaniun and replace it with stainless steel, why?

another thing, an LS7 has all these super light parts inside of the motor but to really make HP you need to raise the RPM or stroke the motor, so bigger cam and shorter runner intake or go big and keep the RPMs down.

I really dont know how much HP your looking for or expecting

[Pesce Nero]

I just read the Mast heads are a different casting. and that cam sounds fimilar, like maybe the same one in the ls7 for sale on this board.

IDK, I wouldn't pay that kind of money for 20hp

[FRDnemesis]

Originally Posted by Pesce Nero

first off, I have been to LS Fest twice and have seen many heads that claim to go over 400 cfm so I dont think any of those posted numbers are out of line.

next thing is the Mast heads were only a 20hp improvement over stock heads. also, they take out all the titaniun and replace it with stainless steel, why?

another thing, an LS7 has all these super light parts inside of the motor but to really make HP you need to raise the RPM or stroke the motor, so bigger cam and shorter runner intake or go big and keep the RPMs down.

I really dont know how much HP your looking for or expecting

Right now I make 580RWHP with stock heads, .660/.649 lift 246/252 duration on a 111 with a FAST 102mm throttle body and intake.

My goal is around 620RWHP, using the Mast Cylinder heads, bumping compression and including Meth into the equation. That shouldn't be too hard I would think being that Mast made right at 700FWHP in that article with a similar cam to what I will be removing AND through a stock throttle body and stock intake. Ed Curtis at Flow Tech Induction is working on spec'ing a Cam for me based on my goals and use of the vehicle.

That extra 40+rwhp could be easily attainable or it could be an oasis.........

[Pesce Nero]

Originally Posted by FRDnemesis

Right now I make 580RWHP with stock heads, .660/.649 lift 246/252 duration on a 111 with a FAST 102mm throttle body and intake.

My goal is around 620RWHP, using the Mast Cylinder heads, bumping compression and including Meth into the equation. That shouldn't be too hard I would think being that Mast made right at 700FWHP in that article with a similar cam to what I will be removing AND through a stock throttle body and stock intake. Ed Curtis at Flow Tech Induction is working on spec'ing a Cam for me based on my goals and use of the vehicle.

That extra 40+rwhp could be easily attainable or it could be an oasis.........

for 4k, I would stroke it and you would have a monster.

how are you going to bump compression?