![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
|
Or anybody for that matter. Anyone want to way in on maf vs sd tune. Pros or Cons , anybody around here running SD at all?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: West Ash
Posts: 4,283
|
im going to be running sd when my car is back together but im FI
__________________
![]() Funny |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,014
|
I run SD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SUMMERVILLE
Posts: 3,681
|
for a basic nothing really special i think a maf is prolly the easiest
__________________
IM BAD BOB |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,089
|
MAF is easiest, but I prefere SD. I run all my stuff in SD except my G8, I run in MAF only but its a E38 so thats a dissfernt story. I ran my Z06 SD, my camaro, truck and every other crs of mine.
It really depends on the mods and what your trying to do on which would be better. There are tons of myths about SD all over the internet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
|
Thanks for the input guys. Still toying with idea of a single plain and 4brl tb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,489
|
I don't care either way, from a tuning standpoint. SD is definately easier to "package" in an engine compartment. With some of the new aftermarket sensors and GMs use of the "card" style MAF, they don't create the airflow restrictions they once did.
__________________
Jaime |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Goose Creek
Posts: 1,232
|
Talk to 1iron. His SD system works very well on his car.
__________________
88 Mustang LX mild 302, no laughing gas, and the rest is secret. Best 1/8th 7.843 @ 87.98, best 1/4 12.427 @ 111.20, best 60 1.601 89 Mustang LX wheels up @ Pinks All Out
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|